The larger universe before the big bang event, magnetic strong force

Microsoft Azure Latest Simulation Reveals What’s Beyond the Universe! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEelnz45t2c

Region of the larger universe accumulates big bang sized black hole region, gluon condensation nova spews our unconsolidated high energy density cores that seed new galaxy growth. the whole sets bounds on “beyond big bang region” parts of the larger universe. Galaxy sized and larger black hole regions are not consolidated (singularities) but have internal structures and flows. The big bang region of the larger universe is a black hole from the outside. But galaxy sized black holes now should be noisy at high frequency gravitational frequencies. Including very bright gravitational sources.

Commenting on https://www.facebook.com/reel/1012620627094603

Mathematical statistics for numbers used in all fields. Or “Data Engineering” – yes, that is a real thing. Or “sensors”. Or “measurement”. I can glance at a billion numbers and see the processes behind the numbers. I like “noise” and “chaos” and “turbulence” the most. Your video is a great insight that can save people decades of their life being miserable. I went into physics when what I loved was data (numbers).

Commenting on https://www.facebook.com/reel/866799752245042

When two particles with magnetic moments are brought close enough the 1/r^3 potential balances or exceeds the 1/r Coulomb potential. The nuclear “strong’ force is just the magnetic dipole potential to a first approximation. And it is much easier to sort out nuclear reactions just by taking data from the Nudat 3 table of isotopes, and the magnetic dipole and quadrupole moments. I much prefer nuclear engineering and gravitational engineering to “theory” where they never get to make things. Check your concept of “valence” and focus on N-Z the difference between neutron and proton numbers.

There are proton magic numbers and neutron magic numbers. N-Z rotates the table of isotopes so it is easier to read along the stability line. And neutron collections (neutrons can bind by magnetic dipole forces) can have their own stability.

Also if you make particle-antiparticle pairs, they can bind into stable assemblies by magnetic dipole force if you add rotation. They have almost no gravitational mass because it can all go into binding energy. And they have no magnetic moment or charge. Soliton solutions of the nonlinear Schrodinger (or Dirac) equations. I got that idea from Emilio Segre.

Electrons can bind by their magnetic dipole moments. and form stable pairs or chains. Cooper pairs for electrons or protons or neutrons are super conducting.

Not much to find for almost 50 years of looking for “nuclear chemistry” – chemistry at MeV and KeV bond energies. A piece of the puzzle.

Comment on https://www.facebook.com/reel/1014783363922227

Put some full pictures online so people can see them. You only show the construction and parts of them, but it is the full effect that matters Your site is unsatisfying because you do not really show the finished products. In this video you show a full picture, but go by so fast no time to absorb and compare it to memories of other ways of making images. Needs color, there are beautiful colors of strings and threads and filament and wires.

You are rightly proud of what you were able to build, but the use here is for photos. In antennas, and magnetic assemblies and wiring, it is the robotic methods that matter.

You might have to glue the strings, because threads can change with humidity and age.

Commenting on https://www.facebook.com/reel/986007246994779 regarding pulsars coming closer to each other.

The orbital frequency can be measured very precisely and lots of data points to refine and follow it. Sample intensities at GigaSamples per second (Gsps), use that data to fit the intensity curves. Use multiple frequencies of light or electromagnetic measurements. I am going to go look for the details now.

“Science” is not science unless you give references and background information sufficient to cover and check all the details.

Commenting on https://www.facebook.com/reel/481934451640990

In 1975 I worked on a nuclear power plant. It was a stream system with a tiny fission core that made the heat. Then, old steam technology to drive the turbine. So it is inefficient, large and tied to piping and breakable parts. I vowed to find a direct nuclear to electric pathway where you use the nuclear energy as particles, electrons, and kinetic energy directly. Do not use electron volt “chemical bond” technologies (steam) when the original energy is in MeV. Keep the energy density at nuclear levels throughout.

Commenting on https://www.facebook.com/reel/9290103827784440

Neutrons can be as many as you like on their own. It is not hard to work out the most likely sizes and conditions. Even AIs can do it now. So it is proton proton first then neutron-neutron then mixed. In neutron stars the superconducting regions and on the boundaries that give the most likely ones.