and several failed “developed” countries who can barely feed their people fairly.

A Human Engineer Was Left to Die on an Alien Station—Instead, He Rebuilt It Better Than Ever | HFY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0HTvKAbw0U

You have described the state of computing and bureaucracies on earth almost perfectly. I am trying to fix that with the Internet Foundation. I liked your reference to transparent aluminum. I wish I could assign you to simplifying CERN, LIGO and several failed “developed” countries who can barely feed their people fairly.


Teacher Told Black Janitor to Solve Calculus as a Joke—Has No Idea He’s a Math Genius!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUDtM8DrHNM

With 8.2 Billion humans and 5.4 Billion on the Internet, the most respectful and safe strategy is to judge by what people do, not by their titles, or certificates. Learning on the Internet grows every day. Much comes from individuals exploring and sharing what they have found. Learning and exploration are deeply connected – the cannot be taught (forced into minds), but they can be shared and learned. This is one of the saddest stories I have read in my life, but there are many others much sadder because they are not written or shared or considered or acted on. The world is wasting most of most human lives now.


Alien Students Failed the ‘Zero Gravity Farming’ Test—Human Invented Magnetic Soil / HFY

http://youtube.com/watch?v=zksRvttiEeo

There is some flexibility in making the acceleration field variable with height or distance. But it is easily computable and can be implemented with pulsed high frequency nonlinear induction, choosing magnetic materials with known conductivity. A gelatin or thick fluid/plastic matrix can be applied to surfaces. For humans it can be a skin tight fabric. Gravity in space and nano-gravity on earth or adjustable fields during accelerations.


High cost of good software and knowledge:

A systemic Internet issue (5.4 B users). Selling 50000 at $1000 takes less effort than selling 5 Million at $10, if you build slow, free tiers for new users, share, advertise. Affordable tools make stable communities, get bought out, become monopoly cash cows. Users locked in.
In the last 27 years I found that all knowledge (software is one kind of knowledge) goes that way. It is not fair, it raises the cost of all things to benefit a few greedy ones, but I found no exceptions. Often where the founders intention is to make all knowledge open to all. 8.2 Billion humans paying monopoly prices for everything. Owned by the people who were supposed to serve them.

​Teacher Told Black Janitor to Solve Calculus as a Joke—Has No Idea He’s a Math Genius!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUDtM8DrHNM

 

 @UnseenStruggle  I wrote a long reply but it did not show up here. I suggested you use the transcripts of all your videos to refine your ideas and write a book. Use Grok or other AIs to help you.

@UnseenStruggle I usually work 12-18 hours a day, 7 days a week. I am following the whole of the Internet, all humans and all global issues. Trying to redesign the Internet to be fair and open.

“Finding the truth” and “making the truth come out” is what journalism used to be. But media makes their money from chaos and noise and suffering, more than reporting what good is happening. Have you ever seen any media site themselves work on solutions? Gather and offer tools and work towards anything? No, it is “report, but do nothing, share nothing”. Worse, it is usually picking things that inflame and generate interest, but lead to confusion and no resolution.

So that media path is faulty from the beginning, because “media” has no direct stake in solving things. “Media, put your money where your mouth is”. Often media truth uncovers things that cannot be solved by current human wisdom or any means. To make systemic changes takes time and effort. It takes moments for our brains to pose alternatives and “solutions”, but “the whole truth” is usually beyond human capability.

I have been working to see if many independent AIs (different groups, different views, different methods) to ask them about cases and issues. A cluster running AI software can find and sort information faster than humans, then by running longer and cross checking it can summarize. Asking many independent ones, those results can be compared and verified.

A million humans can try to work together to understand something, but they use language that is, at its core, jumbled and incompatible.

Humans immediately form committees and bureaucracies that become networks of dominance, persuasion and gate keeping. Networks that then sustain themselves by gathering money and resources. Groups grow to be self protecting and self promoting. Groups grow to be greedy islands. That seems to be the only model used now. Incorporating and making governments only freezes those structures and makes them less flexible, less fair and less truthful.

I usually write on X. Yesterday I wrote “Grok, Lets Discuss National Science Foundation”.

I looked at your videos. You have 30 videos of about 1 hour each. You have the transcripts for those. If you ask Grok or OpenAI GPT, they can reformat those into paragraphs and publishable form. Writing a book is a good way to try to understand what you are searching. But discussing things openly helps to refine and organize. You have comments on your videos, those are also part of your larger story. Part of your community and goals and life’s path.

The AIs can discuss issues with you and suggest new views and ways of doing things. They have many flaws and it takes time to learn what is real and what is not. But (I spent two years every day with OpenAI and 1 year with Grok), it is possible to have them help you write and refine your ideas and offer suggestions for being more effective.

Grok was able to convert a transcript of your most recent video to paragraphs. You have to tell it to convert the whole transcript to story or paragraph form. Then keep that prompt that works and use that for other videos.

Many new “AIs” come out every day, and are becoming part of everyday life. Can they contribute to a more complete, open, verifiable and fair world for all? I would hope so. All I know to do it keep trying, and a fair amount of praying to do my best for the most people. One life is all we get.

Sincere regards,
Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation


Can you solve “tragedy of the commons” with customer focus? It must have a solution, a simple one.


Comment on living in cars – https://www.facebook.com/reel/1731809047753574

Globally it is about 50 to 120 Million displaced by wars and soft genocide (forcing out of lands) It has always been done. And can be planned for. Now “climate” is forcing another 50 Million or so. Floods and drought. Political refugees are helped sometimes, climate almost not at all, and economic rarely. “poverty” usually equals “lower quality living spaces”. It is predictable, sometimes preventable, and driven by “a few who take from the many” in most cases. Famine, war, migration,rural urban. It is sad to see; it not hard to track, but no government or UN deals with it effectively. Corporations and cartels cause much of it. Cars, tents, huge cities, larger slums, dense poverty areas, living on monstrous trash heaps, slave labor, child labor. What a wonderful world we have today. AIs are going to accelerate corporations taking more and not giving back.

commenting on strong permanent magnets switching reluctance of transformers

Thanks for sharing. I have often thought this but had no way to test it. Who has time for trillions of possible things?
Richard K Collins

About: Richard K Collins

The Internet Foundation Internet policies, global issues, global open lossless data, global open collaboration


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *