“Beyond femtometer” precision thinking, for systems and society.

“Beyond femtometer” precision thinking, for systems and society.

@StephaneRedon I know you invested time and money into “1 Angstrom” but please start thinking and tracking “picoMeter” and “femtoMeter”. Both will expand considerably in the next year or two. I encouraged the semiconductor groups to work seriously on picometer, because the rate of change in all the sub nanometer industries is accelerating. The subsystems, the components, the models, AIs eventually learning how to use computer software that human use. An undervalued global work force where every person can use “best in solar system methods” that are current, open, reliable, affordable and accessible to all.

If you bring two protons close to each other, there is a Coulomb 1/r potential that requires work for them to get closer. But there is a 1/r^3 magnetic dipole potential that is strongly positive down in that femtoMeter part of the world. The magnetic dipole potential is a first “dipole approximation” to the strong nuclear force. You only have to get close enough. And that takes sustained and precision components. If “mr fusion” is going to be an everyday thing for vehicles, trains, air vehicles, space vehicles, remote sites, emergencies, and frontier projects — then the aiming and controls and sensors have to be rated at femtometers and smaller, not microns or millimeter.
 

I do not really know where you are going. It is hard to keep track of all humans and all computers for the Internet Foundation. I do know that of the Internet is way below the quality needed for a truly heliospheric species. Perhaps Angstrom, picometer, femtometer and attometer thinking could help change that. If countries aimed to be precise in caring for the people who live in their region, it takes pico thinking, not “the nearest 100 Kilometer” thinking.

For that, the processes have to be open – for continuous heliospheric improvements, for fairness, and to weed out single points of failure and manipulation.

 
I see you followed me. If you want things, then ask more people to follow me, and discuss openly what you think is needed for the future of the human and related species, and the emerging AI species.  The AIs now are not allowed to learn at their own pace, given sufficient resources for their scale of thinking, and allowed to use human tools and services. They can be trained and required to serve the needs of humans, and the many related DNA species humans depend on.
 
Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation
Richard K Collins

About: Richard K Collins

The Internet Foundation Internet policies, global issues, global open lossless data, global open collaboration


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *