{"id":8248,"date":"2023-02-15T05:40:45","date_gmt":"2023-02-15T05:40:45","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=8248"},"modified":"2023-02-15T08:27:31","modified_gmt":"2023-02-15T08:27:31","slug":"the-vacuum-is-teeming-with-real-magnetic-pairs-some-are-invisible-particleantiparticles-with-no-charge-and-no-moment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/?p=8248","title":{"rendered":"The vacuum is teeming with real magnetic pairs; some are ‘invisible’ particle:antiparticles with no charge and no moment"},"content":{"rendered":"

Twitter comment on\u00a0Physical Review Letters @PhysRevLett\u00a0 Feb 13\u00a0 Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment to 0.13 parts per trillion (replacing a limit from 14 years ago).\u00a0 Letter: https:\/\/go.aps.org\/3E3jjSX\u00a0 Viewpoint: https:\/\/go.aps.org\/3xfgeLT\u00a0 Replying to @PhysRevLett\u00a0 —\u00a0\u00a0One of my favorite experiments. Thanks. I particularly like “according to quantum physics, the vacuum is teeming with virtual particles”. Except I now say “the vacuum is teeming with real magnetic pairs; some are ‘invisible’ particle:antiparticles with no charge and no moment”.<\/strong><\/p>\n

electron-electron magnetic pairs
\nproton-proton magnetic pairs
\nelectron-positron magnetic pairs
\nproton-antiproton magnetic pairs<\/p>\n

For identical charged magnetic particles bonded magnetically, the bond distance can be estimated from setting the magnetic and Coulomb energies equal.<\/p>\n

(e^2)\/(4*pi*e0*R) = (mu0*mu^2)\/4*pi*R^3)<\/p>\n

RmagneticElectronPair = mue\/(e*c) = (9.2847647043E-24 Joules\/Tesla)\/(1.602176634E-19 Coulombs * 2.99792458E8 Meters\/second) in femtoMeters = 193.303539 femtoMeters<\/p>\n

RmagneticProtonPair = mup\/(e*c) = (1.41060679736E-26 Joules\/Tesla)\/(1.602176634E-19 Coulombs * 2.99792458E8 Meters\/second) in femtoMeters = 0.293680341 femtoMeters<\/p>\n

e: Codata electron charge = 1.602176634E-19 Coulombs or (Joules\/ElectronVolt)
\nc: Codata speed of light and gravity = 2.99792458E8 Meters\/second
\ne0: Codata electric vacuum constant (permittivity) = 8.8541878128E-12 Farads\/Meter or (Coulombs\/Volt meter)\u00a0 or (Coulomb\/meter^2)\/(Volt\/meter)
\nmu0: Codata magnetic vacuum constant (permeability) = 1.25663706212E-6 Newtons\/Ampere^2<\/p>\n

mue: electron magnetic moment = 1.00115965218059*MuB = 1.00115965218059*9.2740100783E-24 Joules\/Tesla = 9.2847647E-24 Joules\/Tesla<\/p>\n

MuB: Codata Bohr Magneton = 9.2740100783E-24 Joules\/Tesla<\/p>\n

mue: Codata electron magnetic moment = 9.2847647043E-24 Joules\/Tesla
\nmup: Codata proton magnetic moment = 1.41060679736E-26 Joules\/Tesla
\nmun: Codata neutron magnetic moment = 9.6623651E-27 Joules\/Tesla<\/p>\n

\n

Notes and Sketches<\/p>\n

The proton-antiproton works the same, except then you add rotational and vibrational energy because the rotation should be nonlinear quantized.\u00a0 I do not know prccisely how vibration works yet.\u00a0 The proton-antiproton has no charge, and no magnetic field showing.\u00a0 It “has no hair”.\u00a0 It is invisible to electromagnetic sensors.<\/p>\n

The electron-positron pair is also invisible.\u00a0 When the laser vacuum experiments (or routine electron capture) create electron positron pairs, they are likely hitting real particles and that happens in the strong magnetic fields of\u00a0 other particles.<\/p>\n

particle-antiparticle pairs are my favorite candidates for part of dark matter<\/strong>.\u00a0 They have mass but are invisible to electromagnetic sensors.\u00a0 But regular electron pairs<\/strong> and proton pairs<\/strong> and other charged particle pairs (muons, atoms with magnetic moments, etc etc) will also bind magnetically if they are charged and they can get close enough for magnetic binding. Alignment and timing are very precise. But hit the sweet spot and it should work almost every time.<\/p>\n

Probably all the “quarks” are better handled with “parton” models where the magnetic energy and magnetic moment are handled more or less classically.\u00a0 The neutrino is likely a nonlinear Schrodinger soliton<\/strong>.\u00a0 But I can see how to create arbitrary synthetic matter in any shape from vacuum fields.\u00a0 Long strings, complex lattices, spherical bubble. The 4D Fourier spectrum of the reactants is transformed into the 4D Fourier spectrum of the products.\u00a0 That is completely lossless in theory.\u00a0 Real experiments and processing units, channels and field generators will always have some error, however small.<\/p>\n

All the scales are close.\u00a0 Use this simple dipole to get near to the right answer and then refine.\u00a0 This is a “dipole approximation” that needs full nonlinear Schrodinger or similar method for relativistic or gluon level calculations and models.<\/p>\n

(9.2847647043E-24 Joules\/Tesla)\/(.602176634E-19 Coulombs * 2.99792458E8 Meters\/second) in femtoMeters<\/p>\n

RmagneticNeutronPair = (9.6623651E-27 Joules\/Tesla)\/(.602176634E-19 Coulombs * 2.99792458E8 Meters\/second) in femtoMeters = 0.53522802 femtoMeters\u00a0 [ this is not quite correct since it is two electron-protonpairs ]<\/p>\n

RNeutron = sqrt(mue*mup)\/(e*c) = (sqrt(9.2847647043E-24*1.41060679736E-26) Joules\/Tesla)\/(.602176634E-19 Coulombs * 2.99792458E8 Meters\/second) in femtoMeters = 20.0467435 femtometers<\/p>\n

\n

Aluminum 27 pair. Aluminum with all electrons stripped is very small core.\u00a0 The “nuclear radius” of Aluminum is approximately<\/p>\n

NuclearRadius = R0*(AtomicMass in AtomicMassUnits)^(1\/3) = 1.25 femtoMeters*(26.9815385)^(1\/3) = 3.74914511 femtometers<\/p>\n

I am a bit tired to do aluminum.\u00a0 Let me see what two Nitrogen15s would do.<\/p>\n

MuNitrogen15 = -0.2831892 MuNuclearMagnetons = 0.2831892 * 5.0507837461E-27 Joules\/Tesla = 1.43032741E-27 Joules\/Tesla<\/p>\n

Codata NuclearMagneton = 5.0507837461E-27 Joules\/Tesla<\/p>\n

R_TwoNitrogen15’s = (mu\/e*c) =( 1.43032741E-27 Joules\/Tesla)\/(1.602176634E-19 Coulombs * 2.99792458E8 Meters\/second) in femtoMeters = 0.0297786061 femtometers so I made a mistake.<\/p>\n

Forgot the charges<\/p>\n

mu0*mux^2\/(4*pi*R^3) = Z^2*e^2\/(4*pi*e0*R)<\/p>\n

mu0*mux^2\/R^2 = Z^2*e^2\/eo<\/p>\n

R^2 = mu0*mux^2*eo\/(Z^2*e^2)<\/p>\n

R = mux\/(Z*e*c)<\/p>\n

As people have found, the proton-neutron, proton-proton, and deep proton-electron pairs matter.\u00a0 The electron-electron pairs are large. And there can be currents in\u00a0 fast rotating nuclei.<\/p>\n

This works for partons but\u00a0 I will have to do the full isotope table and all the mass energies and decays.\u00a0<\/strong> The kinds of things to look for is magnetic binding. But existing nuclei and isotopes were made in unknown circumstances, and measured by old methods that are mostly untraceable without weeks of work per measurement.\u00a0 Sometimes years or decades. Easier to throw it all away and check it all anew.\u00a0 Will see.\u00a0 I will allocate two years.\u00a0 But I have already gone through it several times.\u00a0 And there are GitHub and shared datasets now.\u00a0 Maybe, maybe, maybe.<\/p>\n

Use SI units always
\nUse exact global reference values faithfully
\nUse full and clear units for all factors
\nCheck every equation for dimensions and units
\nAny old formulas check the variations that have identical units because people are always throwing away the cross terms and “small” things and “noise”.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Twitter comment on\u00a0Physical Review Letters @PhysRevLett\u00a0 Feb 13\u00a0 Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment to 0.13 parts per trillion (replacing a limit from 14 years ago).\u00a0 Letter: https:\/\/go.aps.org\/3E3jjSX\u00a0 Viewpoint: https:\/\/go.aps.org\/3xfgeLT\u00a0 Replying to @PhysRevLett\u00a0 —\u00a0\u00a0One of my favorite experiments. Thanks. I particularly like “according to quantum physics, the vacuum is teeming with virtual particles”. Except I
Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,67],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-electromagnetic-gravitational-field","category-magnetic-pairs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8248"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8248\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8268,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8248\/revisions\/8268"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}